My last post about the MFJ948 T-match tuner conversion to S-match tuner dates from February this year. It contained a fault which was quickly seen by PA0VAJ Jan. I asked the readers if they could discover the fault but it seems no one was really interested or it was too difficult to find. Or readers might have expected I would write about it in a short time. But actually I had other things on my mind and the tuner was put in a carton box for later experimenting.
The fault
The MFJ989 to S-match conversion diagram from PA0FRI's page contains a fault. It is there since 2018 and I don't think anyone has noticed. Probabely no one else has tried to convert a T-match to S-match yet. The coil and capacitor(s) need to be on both sides of the two 8 winding sections. In this diagram the coil is mounted over the 16 winding part.
The strange thing is that the same page does show the correct diagram at the top. I didn't see the difference at first till Jan told me the wiring was incorrect. So, I changed it to correct things.
The problem
After changing the wiring testing showed a little better SWR but still most frequenties couldn't be tuned exactly to 50 Ohm. The problem is the switchable coil. PA0FRI noted this as well and so I changed the wiring again to make a quasi roller inductor. This is done by connecting a varco in series with the coil. Unfortunately the PA0FRI site contains another fault which was easy to see...
Obviously I guess readers of this blog will see this fault instantly.
The result
Much better! I'm finally able to tune 1:1 on most bands from 3,5-30MHz. Except 15m, for that band I need to switch extra capacity over te main capacitor C2. For 80m it helps as well to get a slightly better SWR. For 60m I need to connect the antenna over de coil, it will not tune when connected over the capacitor. Tuning is pretty difficult since the components in the MFJ-948 are small. I remember it was difficult to tune when it still was a T-match tuner as well. Without a antenna analyzer like the MFJ-948 I use it is almost impossible to find the right settings.
For archive purposes this is my list of settings:
S-match test |
Over L Over C
Band | C1 | L | C2 | C1 | L | C2 | |
80* | 8 | K | 5,5 | 6 | L | 1,5 | |
60 | 3,75 | K | 0 | np | np | np | |
40 | 2 | J | 12 | -3,5 | L | -3,5 | |
30 | 1 | I | -5 | -3 | F | -2 | |
20 | 0,5 | H | -3 | -1 | F | -1 | |
17 | 2 | E | -3 | 0 | E | -2 | |
15* | 10,5 | L | 7 | np | np | np | |
12 | 1 | I | 9,5 | 2,5 | E | -2 | |
10 | 9,5 | H | -1 | I | C | -4 |
4 comments:
Interessant project. 73 Ron
Hi Bas
Thanks for pointing out the error in the schematic for the MFJ-989 S Match conversion. I am doing such a conversion now and have a good MFJ989 to work with. Maybe I'll be the second ham to do such a conversion!
Your timing is perfect. You did a nice job with your MFJ948 S-Match conversion.
73
Steve Silverman KB3SII
steve@QRPworks.com
Hello Steve, good luck with your conversion. The MFJ989 does have better (bigger) components. I think that will have a big influence on efficiency. 73, Bas
Zeker, en zeer leerzaam Ron. Deed er alleen nogal lang over. Maar het is nu eindelijk klaar. 73, Bas
Post a Comment