Pages

Saturday, November 14, 2020

MFJ948 to S-match conversion (3)

 My last post about the MFJ948 T-match tuner conversion to S-match tuner dates from February this year. It contained a fault which was quickly seen by PA0VAJ Jan. I asked the readers if they could discover the fault but it seems no one was really interested or it was too difficult to find. Or readers might have expected I would write about it in a short time. But actually I had other things on my mind and the tuner was put in a carton box for later experimenting.

The fault


The MFJ989 to S-match conversion diagram from PA0FRI's page contains a fault. It is there since 2018 and I don't think anyone has noticed. Probabely no one else has tried to convert a T-match to S-match yet. The coil and capacitor(s) need to be on both sides of the two 8 winding sections. In this diagram the coil is mounted over the 16 winding part.



The strange thing is that the same page does show the correct diagram at the top. I didn't see the difference at first till Jan told me the wiring was incorrect. So, I changed it to correct things.





The problem

After changing the wiring testing showed a little better SWR but still most frequenties couldn't be tuned exactly to 50 Ohm. The problem is the switchable coil. PA0FRI noted this as well and so I changed the wiring again to make a quasi roller inductor. This is done by connecting a varco in series with the coil. Unfortunately the PA0FRI site contains another fault which was easy to see...

Obviously I guess readers of this blog will see this fault instantly. 


The result

Much better! I'm finally able to tune 1:1 on most bands from 3,5-30MHz. Except 15m, for that band I need to switch extra capacity over te main capacitor C2. For 80m it helps as well to get a slightly better SWR. For 60m I need to connect the antenna over de coil, it will not tune when connected over the capacitor. Tuning is pretty difficult since the components in the MFJ-948 are small. I remember it was difficult to tune when it still was a T-match tuner as well. Without a antenna analyzer like the MFJ-948 I use it is almost impossible to find the right settings.

For archive purposes this is my list of settings: 

S-match test

Over L                            Over C

BandC1LC2C1LC2
80*8K5,56L1,5
603,75K0npnpnp
402J12-3,5L-3,5
301I-5-3F-2
200,5H-3-1F-1
172E-30E-2
15*10,5L7
npnpnp
121I9,52,5E-2
109,5H-1IC-4

np=not possible
* with 300pF C parallel over C2

Now, the S-match tuner seems to be excellent to balance your transmission line. But is it efficient? I think that depends on what components you use. The MFJ-948 components are not that great...
To determine the quality of the build and compare it with my Palstar AT1KM I should build a RF antennacurrent meter first. More about that later...

The finished project:




4 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Zeker, en zeer leerzaam Ron. Deed er alleen nogal lang over. Maar het is nu eindelijk klaar. 73, Bas

      Delete
  2. Hi Bas

    Thanks for pointing out the error in the schematic for the MFJ-989 S Match conversion. I am doing such a conversion now and have a good MFJ989 to work with. Maybe I'll be the second ham to do such a conversion!

    Your timing is perfect. You did a nice job with your MFJ948 S-Match conversion.

    73
    Steve Silverman KB3SII
    steve@QRPworks.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Steve, good luck with your conversion. The MFJ989 does have better (bigger) components. I think that will have a big influence on efficiency. 73, Bas

      Delete

Thanks for your comment. Bedankt voor je reactie. 73, Bas