My last post about the MFJ948 T-match tuner conversion to S-match tuner dates from February this year. It contained a fault which was quickly seen by PA0VAJ Jan. I asked the readers if they could discover the fault but it seems no one was really interested or it was too difficult to find. Or readers might have expected I would write about it in a short time. But actually I had other things on my mind and the tuner was put in a carton box for later experimenting.
The fault
The MFJ989 to S-match conversion diagram from PA0FRI's page contains a fault. It is there since 2018 and I don't think anyone has noticed. Probabely no one else has tried to convert a T-match to S-match yet. The coil and capacitor(s) need to be on both sides of the two 8 winding sections. In this diagram the coil is mounted over the 16 winding part.
The strange thing is that the same page does show the correct diagram at the top. I didn't see the difference at first till Jan told me the wiring was incorrect. So, I changed it to correct things.
The problem
After changing the wiring testing showed a little better SWR but still most frequenties couldn't be tuned exactly to 50 Ohm. The problem is the switchable coil. PA0FRI noted this as well and so I changed the wiring again to make a quasi roller inductor. This is done by connecting a varco in series with the coil. Unfortunately the PA0FRI site contains another fault which was easy to see...
Obviously I guess readers of this blog will see this fault instantly.
The result
Much better! I'm finally able to tune 1:1 on most bands from 3,5-30MHz. Except 15m, for that band I need to switch extra capacity over te main capacitor C2. For 80m it helps as well to get a slightly better SWR. For 60m I need to connect the antenna over de coil, it will not tune when connected over the capacitor. Tuning is pretty difficult since the components in the MFJ-948 are small. I remember it was difficult to tune when it still was a T-match tuner as well. Without a antenna analyzer like the MFJ-948 I use it is almost impossible to find the right settings.
For archive purposes this is my list of settings:
S-match test |
Over L Over C
Band | C1 | L | C2 | C1 | L | C2 | |
80* | 8 | K | 5,5 | 6 | L | 1,5 | |
60 | 3,75 | K | 0 | np | np | np | |
40 | 2 | J | 12 | -3,5 | L | -3,5 | |
30 | 1 | I | -5 | -3 | F | -2 | |
20 | 0,5 | H | -3 | -1 | F | -1 | |
17 | 2 | E | -3 | 0 | E | -2 | |
15* | 10,5 | L | 7 | np | np | np | |
12 | 1 | I | 9,5 | 2,5 | E | -2 | |
10 | 9,5 | H | -1 | I | C | -4 |
Interessant project. 73 Ron
ReplyDeleteZeker, en zeer leerzaam Ron. Deed er alleen nogal lang over. Maar het is nu eindelijk klaar. 73, Bas
DeleteHi Bas
ReplyDeleteThanks for pointing out the error in the schematic for the MFJ-989 S Match conversion. I am doing such a conversion now and have a good MFJ989 to work with. Maybe I'll be the second ham to do such a conversion!
Your timing is perfect. You did a nice job with your MFJ948 S-Match conversion.
73
Steve Silverman KB3SII
steve@QRPworks.com
Hello Steve, good luck with your conversion. The MFJ989 does have better (bigger) components. I think that will have a big influence on efficiency. 73, Bas
Delete