Rerouted the coax lines. The PL259 in front is a spare coax to the garage. |
Before I changed the cables I took the opportunity to measure the loss in the lines on 70MHz, 50MHz and 28MHz, the highest frequencies I'm using.
Loss in line 1: approx 35m H2007 coax
28MHz - 1,4dB
50Mhz - 2 dB
70Mhz - 2,5dB
Loss in line 2: approx 30m LMR400 + 5m H2007
28MHz - 1 dB
50MHz - 1,4dB
70MHz - 1,6dB
I use this site; http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-amplification.htm for calculations.
I had the 10m LFA beam connected to line 1 which had a loss of 1,4dB. 100W in gave me 85W at the junction cabinet below the tower. Estimated loss in the coax from the cabinet to the beam including the 0,1dB loss from the lightning protection and coaxrelay is a additional 0,5dB. So in the end only 80W is arriving at the antenna.
Now I connected the HF vertical to line 1 and moved line 2 from the vertical to the 10m LFA beam. 1dB loss calculated 100W in gave me 89W at the junction cabinet. With a additional 0,5dB loss to the antenna I have 84W at the antenna.
Yes, by switching the cables I have 4W more power at the antenna. Will anyone notice??
I could have told you that before I did this experiment, but just to show that it doesn't matter much what coax you use on HF. I wrote about that before
On the other hand. Line 1 would be almost cut my power in half on 70Mhz! Coax is a whole different story on VHF. I have the 50MHz/70MHz yagi connected to line 2. Based on earlier measurements and calculations the coax from junction box to the antenna including loss from lightning protector and antennarelay for VHF will be 0,7dB.
50MHz total loss over coax 2,1dB. 100W in will give 78W at the antenna.
70MHz total loss over coax 2,3dB. 50W in will give 38W at the antenna.
(Why not 100W at 70MHz? We are only allowed 50W at that frequency...)
Well you see that the worst effect is on 70MHz. But would a coax upgrade make a huge difference?
Very expensive coax cable like M&P hyperflex13 or Ecoflex15 have a loss of about 0,6dB for 30m length. Even more expensive would be hardline like cellflex have 0,2dB loss for a cheap one and 0,15dB loss for a expensive one. (all on 50MHz). Would it be worth the expense to invest in such cables?
Let's asume I change the entire cable from shack to antenna for Ecoflex15. It is about 40m of coax and leave the relay and lighning protectors outside this. Loss would be 0,7dB in total including the connectors (N-type). 100W in will give 92W at the antenna. I think you will hardly notice the difference between 78W and 92W. But you will notice that your wallet is empty! (it would cost me €300 including quality connectors!)
Overall I won't change my coax. It is still good enough for me. If I want to gain something I better invest in a bigger antenna on 50MHz/70MHz. You can easily compensate your coax loss with a few extra directors on the beam and it could be cheaper as well.
Compensation for coax loss!! |
Very interesting Bas. I agree, there's a fine line between RF gain and Financial loss :-D
ReplyDeleteTake care, Tom, M7MCQ.
Hallo Bas, ach, die verliezen vallen wel mee. Een slechte SWR is erger. 1 S punt = 6 dB. Op het gehoor zeker niet merkbaar. 73 Paul
ReplyDeleteHallo Paul, slechte SWR dan boven 1:2. Alles er onder is echt geen probleem. Ik merkte dat mijn beam giesteren op 28074 1:1,8 stond. Maar kreeg prima rapporten. Zelf een QSO op FT8 met Puerto Rico nog. En ontving J69 met +2 73, Bas
DeleteBij 1:3 of beter 3:1 dan heb je 25% verlies. Ik probeer altijd onder 1:1,5 te blijven. Mijn End Fed is vaak 1:1 73 Paul
Deletehi bas, that makes a lot of sense. stick an extra element on the antenna for +1db!. i do havae 130m of ldf4-50 in the garage (new) but that only cost me £1.20/metre !! i will use it one day.
ReplyDeletestu