Since my antenna tower is grounded I searched for a way to shunt feed with a autotuner like a gammamatch. I found a article from N6TZ Hal on eham and although I read it I picked only the most important things out of it and used what I got. N6TZ is a broadcast engineer and his website is mainly about his antenna setup, a good read. Most important I think is that the beam on top is grounded to the mast and luckely it is, normally coax should also be grounded at the bottom but I have my RF systems isolator box so there is no galvanic connection between coax of the tower and the coax to the shack. Another important thing is that all wires and coax should be running inside the tower and in my case it is.| Autotuner box, note the groundrod at the left. |
| View from the autotuner to the mast. |
The shunt fed tower should work fine from 160m-40m. I tried to transmit on the system and it was tuned easily on all bands. I made some contacts on 60m and found I got unexpected surprisingly good reports. Switching from the inverted-V to the shunt fed tower didn't show me real differences.
I was thinking about my testing method to compare antennas and thought the only way to get a real(time) comparisation result should be with 2 transmitters on WSPR transmitting the same power at the same moment. So I made 2 WSPR stations PE4BAS on the shunt fed tower and PE4BAS/P on the inverted-V both transmitting 1W on different frequencies in the WSPR spectrum at the same time. I'm shure this is the best method determing which antenna is best under same circumstances taking a fast changing propagation in mind. I tried to find stations around Europe and DX to compare. Only on 60m there were no DX stations on the WSPR frequency.
Band
| Call | Band | inverted-V | Vertical |
| WA9WTK | 40m | -15 | -28 |
| SV8RV | 40m | -24 | -29 |
| IU5HKU | 40m | -27 | -27 |
| IU1GLI | 60m | -13 | -16 |
| F5VBD | 60m | -11 | -7 |
| I6/IW2NKE | 60m | -11 | -8 |
| DP0GVN | 80m | -23 | -21 |
| GM4FVM | 80m | -11 | -16 |
| DK8FT/B | 80m | -19 | -23 |
| F59706/1 | 160m | -12 | -8 |
| SWUKSDR/2 | 160m | -23 | -14 |
| Hopefully this will reduce some RFI on both TX as RX. |
Improvement of this system
Oh yes, reading the N6TZ's website a lot of things came to my mind. I could attach a tracer wire from top to bottom wrapped a few times around the tower to make it a more constant conducting element. Then the groundsystem. I only use 2 short elevated radials now, but everyone knows you need much more to increase the radiation. On both tower as autotuner should be much more conductors. I'm even thinking about connecting the fence wire, used for the beverage experiments, to the ground. For receive I'm already thinking about another antenna since the vertical doesn't receive as well or the same as my inverted-V.
| Test setup 2 WSPR stations PE4BAS (tower) & PE4BAS/P (inv-V) |
Interesting, Bas. Your results prove the worthiness of this antenna on low bands and it is surprising that so many people seem unaware of it.
ReplyDeleteMy first time in hearing of this antenna was from Fred KT5X. With a very similar configuration he worked all US states in one night while QRP on 160 meters; he also obtained his QRP WAC on 160 meters. I emailed him, asking for the specifics and posted his response on my old blog back in 2010 and I've now re-posted it.
Good luck with your new lowband pursuits!
73 - John
Can you put a link to it. I tried to find it.
Deletehttps://www.eham.net/article/10631
ReplyDelete