Pages

Monday, November 27, 2017

#cqww CW 2017 80m

Event: CQWW CW 2017
SOA low/qrp dutch records

Section:  Single Operator unassisted  QRP 80M
Logger: N1MM+ newest version
Station: Icom IC-706 MK2G 5W
Antenna: Inverted-V apex 12m + multiband vertical
CW decoder: FLdigi newest version

Well, a few hours of participation time early in the morning and late in the evening resulted in only 60 QSOs. No DX, only European stations. I certainly miss my 80m horizontal loop in a contest like this. The inverted-V was not doing well, I guess it is because of the wet ladderline feeding the antenna giving me some loss. The vertical did sometimes better although it is very ineffective (too short) for 80m. When starting the contest Saturday morning my FLdigi was mysteriously disappeared? Had to install a new one and redirect N1MM+ to it before I could decode CW. After that it was no problem, although I had to finetune a bit till I got best decodes. Still, I had the idea the old FLdigi did a better job. Of course CWskimmer would be the best, I've been experimenting with it in 2015. I still hope for a free good CW decoder like CWskimmer one day. But when you are QRP it is not really important as most of the weaker signals are not able to copy you at all. For a new dutch record I switched off the telnet connection for a DXcluster to be unassisted. Actually in previous years the DXcluster didn't help me at all as spots are on the right frequency on CW but not for MCW in USB mode.

4 comments:

  1. Hi Bas have a look to free CW Decoder (no multidecoding)
    http://www.hotamateurprograms.com/downloads.htm
    73

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've seen it at other amateurs as well. Might be interesting to try. Tnx for the tip! 73, Bas

      Delete
  2. Hallo Bas, de condx zijn vaak niet al te best. Die 80 m loop zal je zeker missen. CWskimmer vind ik nog altijd de beste decoder, zelfs met zwakke CW signalen. Maar ja, het is best prijzig in aanschaf. Hoewel het z'n geld heeft opgebracht. Ik gebruik het bijna dagelijks en al 10 jaar. De CW decoder van FLdigi is matig en werk alleen goed bij wat sterkere signalen, maar dan zijn alle letters en cijfers aan elkaar geplakt. Dat is weer lastig lezen. CWskimmer is smart en haalt het uit elkaar als leesbare tekst. Ik had zoveel andere dingen te doen dat ik geen tijd heb gehad om aan de contest iets te doen. 73 Paul PC4T

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CWskimmer is het beste, dat heb ik in 2015 wel gemerkt. Maar kost ook geld. En dat heb ik er niet voor over eerlijk gezegd. 73, Bas

      Delete

Thanks for your comment. Bedankt voor je reactie. 73, Bas